I’d start with the Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sled if you want strength and conditioning work that can move between indoor and outdoor surfaces. For a more measurable, repeatable workout in a fixed space, the Relentless Ripper Ski Trainer stands out with ten resistance levels and an LED monitor. The Relentless Rope Trainer is the more focused choice for fast, forceful pulls and bidirectional rope work.
Get workout gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
These picks serve different training styles, so my ranking reflects versatility, workout feedback, and setup demands rather than a claim that one tool suits every gym. The M1 is the most flexible about where you train, but it weighs 67 pounds and does not provide specific resistance-level details. The Ripper tracks more metrics and offers finer adjustment, though it needs a compatible mount and a corded power source. The rope trainer takes less space than a freestanding sled, but it also depends on a suitable rack, rig, or optional wall bracket.
Complete the kit
Key Takeaways
- TANK M1: My overall pick for buyers who want a movable, all-surface sled and variable magnetic resistance without a mounting requirement.
- Relentless Ripper: The clearest choice for structured ski-style conditioning, with ten resistance levels and a monitor for workout metrics.
- Relentless Rope Trainer: Best for bidirectional rope pulls and variable effort in a compact rack- or rig-mounted setup.
- The M1 weighs 67 pounds; the Ripper weighs 50 pounds; and the rope trainer weighs 45 pounds, so moving and mounting each tool call for different planning.
- Before choosing either mounted trainer, check your rack or rig dimensions and installation options; the Ripper also needs corded power.
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sled |  | Best Overall — most flexible placement and training use | Equipment type: Manually operated training sled | Resistance: Mag-Force variable resistance brake | Handle type: Removable | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripper Ski Trainer |  | Best for structured conditioning — adjustable resistance and workout metrics | Equipment type: Ski trainer | Resistance: 10 levels of adjustable magnetic resistance | Monitor: LED performance monitor: time, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope Trainer |  | Best for compact rope work — focused pulls from a compatible rack or rig | Equipment type: Manual rope trainer | Resistance: Magnetic force; 4 selectable levels that increase with pulling speed and effort | Movement: Bidirectional rope training | VIEW LATEST PRICE | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Torque Fitness strength equipment | Equipment type | Resistance | Weight | Warranty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sl | Manually operated training sled | Mag-Force variable resistance brake | 67 pounds | 10 years on frame and welds; 1 year on parts and workmanship or materials |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripp | Ski trainer | 10 levels of adjustable magnetic resistance | 50 pounds | 10 years on frame; 5 years on structural moving parts; 2 years on miscellaneous parts |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope | Manual rope trainer | Magnetic force; 4 selectable levels that increase with pulling speed and effort | 45 pounds | — |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sled
The TANK M1 is my best overall pick because it can serve buyers who do not want their conditioning tool fixed to a wall or rack. It is manually operated, uses a variable magnetic resistance brake, and is described for home gyms, fitness facilities, and outdoor spaces. Its all-surface design gives it a broader placement range than either mounted trainer: the Ripper and rope trainer both rely on compatible mounting hardware or a suitable strength system.
That flexibility is especially useful if you want to move between pushing and other sled-style movements, or if your training area changes from session to session. The removable handles help with storage and transport, while virtually silent operation may suit shared spaces where a loud mechanical training tool would be unwelcome. It arrives as an M1 sled, so I would not assume that additional accessories are included unless confirmed separately.
The tradeoff is its 67-pound weight. Removable handles may help, but they do not make the sled light to carry, so regular transport between a home gym and outdoor space could become a chore. Resistance is described as variable, but no exact levels or adjustment procedure are supplied. Buyers who want clear, numbered increments and workout metrics will find the Ripper easier to program around; those who want direct rope-specific work should choose the Relentless Rope Trainer instead.
Its frame-and-weld warranty is listed as ten years, with one year on parts and workmanship or materials. For me, the M1 makes the strongest general-purpose case in this lineup, provided the buyer has room to move it and is comfortable with resistance details that are less explicit than the Ripper’s.
Pros:- All-surface design supports use in different training locations.
- Variable magnetic resistance accommodates a range of movements and effort.
- Virtually silent operation suits settings where equipment noise matters.
- Removable handles help with storage and transport.
Cons:- At 67 pounds, it may be awkward to move between locations.
- The available details do not specify resistance levels or how adjustment works.
- It does not provide the workout metrics listed for the Ripper.
Best for: Home or facility users who want a manually operated sled for varied movements across indoor and outdoor surfaces, and who can manage a 67-pound unit.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a fixed, numbered resistance scale, a workout monitor, or a light tool that is easy to carry frequently.
- Equipment type:Manually operated training sled
- Resistance:Mag-Force variable resistance brake
- Handle type:Removable
- Weight:67 pounds
- Material:Alloy steel
- Use:Home gyms, fitness facilities, and outdoor spaces
- Warranty:10 years on frame and welds; 1 year on parts and workmanship or materials
Our verdict“I recommend the TANK M1 to buyers who value a movable, all-surface sled more than numbered resistance settings or integrated workout tracking.”
Torque Fitness Relentless Ripper Ski Trainer
The Relentless Ripper is the strongest match for buyers who want ski-style conditioning with measurable sessions. Its ten levels of progressive magnetic resistance give more explicit adjustment than the TANK M1’s unspecified variable setting and the rope trainer’s four selectable levels. An LED performance monitor reports time, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance, giving a user more information to compare one session with another.
It is also the most clearly organized option for repeatable programming. A buyer can choose a resistance level and track several metrics, while the M1 is more open-ended and the rope trainer is focused on pulling effort and movement variety. The Ripper’s ergonomic grips support single-pole and double-pole movements, allowing different ski-pull patterns. Its compact dimensions and wall, rack, or rig mounting options can free up floor space compared with keeping a sled accessible in a training lane.
Mounting flexibility is not the same as a ready-to-use setup, however. At 50 pounds, installation may take planning, and the unit requires a compatible wall mount, Torque rack or rig, or compatible strength system. It also uses corded electric power, which affects placement and cable routing. If your gym has no appropriate mount or power access, the M1 is less dependent on the room, while the rope trainer may suit a compatible rack with a smaller footprint.
The Ripper’s warranty is listed as ten years on the frame, five years on structural moving parts, and two years on miscellaneous parts. I rank it behind the M1 because it is less broadly placeable, not because it is less specific or informative. For a buyer with the right installation setup who values adjustable, trackable ski training, it is the clearest choice in this group.
Pros:- Ten progressive magnetic resistance levels offer clearly defined adjustment.
- The monitor tracks time, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance.
- Wall and strength-system mounting can save floor space.
- Ergonomic grips support single-pole and double-pole movements.
Cons:- A compatible mount or strength system is required.
- At 50 pounds, installation may be difficult for one person.
- Corded electric power limits placement and requires cable planning.
Best for: Users with a compatible wall, rack, or rig who want adjustable ski-style conditioning and on-screen session metrics.
Not ideal for: Buyers without a suitable mount or corded power access, or those who want a freestanding tool they can move between surfaces.
- Equipment type:Ski trainer
- Resistance:10 levels of adjustable magnetic resistance
- Monitor:LED performance monitor: time, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance
- Mounting compatibility:Wall mount, Torque racks and rigs, and compatible strength systems
- Weight:50 pounds
- Dimensions:24.5 x 21 x 39.1 inches (D x W x H)
- Power:Corded electric
- Warranty:10 years on frame; 5 years on structural moving parts; 2 years on miscellaneous parts
Our verdict“I’d choose the Ripper over the M1 or rope trainer when a compatible mounting point, power access, and detailed ski-workout tracking are priorities.”
Torque Fitness Relentless Rope Trainer
The Relentless Rope Trainer is my pick for buyers who want purpose-built rope pulling without dedicating a broad area to a sled. It attaches to compatible racks or rigs and supports bidirectional movement, with a pivoting head intended to accommodate different pulling angles. Its three-strand, marine-grade rope is designed to help maintain resistance and reduce slippage, which makes the tool more specific to rope work than either the M1 or the ski-focused Ripper.
Resistance behaves differently here than on the Ripper. The rope trainer has four selectable magnetic-force settings, and resistance increases as the user pulls faster or harder. That relationship makes the workout respond to effort, while the Ripper offers ten levels and tracks several session metrics. Compared with the M1, this tool is more compact and more specialized: it does not offer the sled’s all-surface movement, but it provides a dedicated pulling station in a smaller listed footprint.
At 45 pounds, it is the lightest of these three products, yet mounting remains part of the decision. It is intended for racks or rigs with tubing measuring six by six inches or smaller; an optional wall-mount bracket is sold separately. A buyer without a compatible rack or a planned wall installation cannot treat the compact dimensions as proof that it will work anywhere. The supplied information also does not list a warranty, so I would check current warranty terms with the seller before buying.
This is the best fit for a gym that already has a compatible structure and wants a compact station for forceful, varied rope pulls. It ranks behind the Ripper for workout data and behind the M1 for placement freedom, but it earns its own role by combining bidirectional action, a pivoting head, and effort-responsive resistance in a focused tool.
Pros:- Supports bidirectional pulls and varied pulling angles.
- Four magnetic resistance settings respond to pulling speed and effort.
- Compact dimensions and a 45-pound listed weight suit space-conscious gyms.
- Marine-grade, three-strand rope is designed to help limit slippage.
Cons:- Requires a compatible rack or rig, or a separate wall-mount solution.
- The optional wall-mount bracket is sold separately.
- No warranty information is provided in the supplied specifications.
Best for: Strength and conditioning users with a compatible rack or rig who want bidirectional rope work and a compact mounted station.
Not ideal for: Buyers seeking a freestanding all-surface sled, an integrated performance monitor, or a ready-to-mount setup without checking compatibility.
- Equipment type:Manual rope trainer
- Resistance:Magnetic force; 4 selectable levels that increase with pulling speed and effort
- Movement:Bidirectional rope training
- Rope:Three-strand twisted marine-grade
- Compatibility:Racks or rigs with 6 x 6-inch tubing or smaller
- Mounting:Rack or rig attachment; optional wall-mount bracket sold separately
- Weight:45 pounds
- Dimensions:17 x 10 x 16 inches (D x W x H)
Our verdict“I’d choose the Relentless Rope Trainer for compact, effort-responsive rope work when rack compatibility is already settled.”
How We Picked
I ranked these three Torque Fitness tools by how well each serves a distinct strength-training use, how much adjustment or workout feedback it offers, and how demanding it is to set up and fit into a gym. They are not interchangeable machines: the TANK M1 is a push sled, the Ripper is a mounted ski trainer, and the rope trainer is built around bidirectional rope pulls. My order favors broad usefulness first, then training feedback and specificity.
The M1 takes the top spot because its all-surface design, removable handles, and manual operation make it the least tied to a particular installation. That flexibility has limits: it is the heaviest item here, and the supplied details do not spell out specific resistance steps. I put the Ripper second because its ten magnetic resistance levels and performance monitor make progression easier to structure, but the required mount and corded electric power narrow where it fits. The rope trainer earns a distinct place for compact, hard-pulling workouts; its four settings and speed-sensitive resistance are useful, though rack compatibility is a gate, not a minor detail.
I used only the supplied product descriptions and specifications. I did not treat these tools as substitutes for a full weight set or assume that a stated feature guarantees a particular training result. Warranty information is included where provided, but missing details—such as the M1’s exact adjustment method—remain unknown rather than inferred.
| Torque Fitness strength equipment | Equipment type |
|---|---|
| Torque Fitness TANK M1 Push Sl | Manually operated training sled |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Ripp | Ski trainer |
| Torque Fitness Relentless Rope | Manual rope trainer |
Factors to Consider When Choosing Best Torque Fitness Strength Equipment
I’d choose among these Torque Fitness tools by matching the movement and installation demands to the gym I actually have. The biggest split is simple: the M1 moves across training surfaces, while the Ripper and rope trainer attach to a fixed structure.Start with the movement you want to train
These products occupy different lanes. The TANK M1 is a sled for pushing and other sled-style work; the Ripper is a ski trainer for single-pole and double-pole pulls; the rope trainer focuses on bidirectional rope work at varied angles. I would choose the movement first, rather than expecting one product to cover all three roles.
If you want a tool that can be used in different locations and across different surfaces, the M1 is the natural fit. For ski-style sessions where stroke rate and distance matter, the Ripper has the clearest training feedback. If rope pulling is the aim and a suitable rack is already in place, the Relentless Rope Trainer offers the most focused setup.
Check mounting, power, and room before buying
The M1 does not require a mount according to the supplied description, but it does need space to move and store a 67-pound sled. Its removable handles help with transport and storage, though they do not eliminate the challenge of moving its full weight.
The Ripper can attach to a wall, Torque rack or rig, or compatible strength system, but the buyer must confirm that the intended mounting point is suitable. It weighs 50 pounds and uses corded electric power, so installation involves both support and cable placement. The rope trainer weighs 45 pounds and fits racks or rigs with tubing of six by six inches or smaller; wall mounting calls for an optional bracket sold separately. I would verify the exact setup before ordering either mounted option.
Compare resistance adjustment honestly
The Ripper provides the clearest stated adjustment scheme: ten levels of progressive magnetic resistance. That helps when a buyer wants defined settings to repeat or change between sessions. The rope trainer lists four settings, with resistance increasing as pulling speed or effort rises. Its response is tied to how it is used, rather than relying only on a chosen setting.
The M1 has a variable magnetic resistance brake, but no specific levels or adjustment details are provided here. I would not assume it offers a numbered scale equivalent to the Ripper’s. If precise, documented increments matter, the Ripper is the safer match based on the available specifications. If a variable sled feel matters more than knowing each step, the M1 remains the more flexible pick.
Decide how much workout feedback you need
The Ripper is the only product in this group with a listed monitor. It displays time, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance, which can help users review a session and build repeatable intervals. The M1 and rope trainer have no monitor listed in the supplied details, so buyers should not expect built-in tracking from those descriptions.
That difference should affect the choice only if metrics are useful to your training. A buyer who prefers open-ended pushing or rope work may have little need for an integrated screen. For structured ski sessions, however, the Ripper’s monitor is a meaningful separation from the other two rather than a cosmetic extra.
Treat weight and storage as part of the workout setup
The listed weights run from 45 pounds for the rope trainer to 50 pounds for the Ripper and 67 pounds for the M1. The two lighter options are mounted rather than freestanding, so their lower weights do not automatically make them easier to install. A fixed setup can still take planning, particularly if the mounting point is high, awkward to access, or not already in place.
The M1 is the least tied to one spot, but it is the heaviest and needs room for sled work. The Ripper’s listed dimensions and mounting choices can help preserve floor space, while the rope trainer’s 17 x 10 x 16-inch dimensions make it the most compact by the stated measurements. I would measure both the equipment location and the working area, not just the storage footprint.
Use warranty details as one part of the comparison
The M1 lists ten years on its frame and welds, plus one year on parts and workmanship or materials. The Ripper lists ten years on its frame, five years on structural moving parts, and two years on miscellaneous parts. No warranty is included in the supplied details for the rope trainer, so I would confirm coverage directly before making a purchase.
These terms are not identical categories, and I would avoid treating the longest listed period as a complete measure of value. Check which components the stated coverage applies to and whether the current seller listing provides additional conditions. For the rope trainer, the missing detail makes verification especially useful.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which Torque Fitness strength tool is the most versatile in this group?
I’d choose the TANK M1 for the broadest placement flexibility because it is designed for home gyms, fitness facilities, and outdoor spaces, and it does not rely on a rack or wall mount in the supplied description. Its all-surface design and variable magnetic resistance support varied sled-style training. That versatility comes with a 67-pound weight and less specific resistance information than the Ripper provides.
Which model offers the most clearly defined resistance adjustment?
The Relentless Ripper Ski Trainer lists ten adjustable magnetic resistance levels, giving it the most explicit adjustment scheme here. The rope trainer has four selectable settings and also responds to pulling speed and effort. The M1 is described as variable, but the supplied details do not identify its levels or adjustment method, so I would not assume it has the same kind of documented increments.
Do the Ripper and rope trainer work without a rack or mount?
Both are described as mounted products, so I would plan for a compatible installation rather than assume either can operate as a freestanding machine. The Ripper supports wall, Torque rack and rig, or compatible strength-system mounting. The rope trainer attaches to racks or rigs with tubing six by six inches or smaller, while its optional wall-mount bracket is sold separately. Confirm the mounting details for your setup before buying.
Which option includes workout tracking?
The Ripper is the only one of the three with a listed performance monitor. It tracks time, strokes per minute, watts, calories, and distance. The supplied descriptions for the TANK M1 and Relentless Rope Trainer do not list monitors, so I would not select either if an integrated display is a requirement.
Which Torque Fitness product should I choose for a small home gym?
I’d base that choice on both floor space and mounting options. The rope trainer has the smallest listed dimensions, but it needs a compatible rack, rig, or separately purchased wall bracket. The Ripper can save floor space through wall or strength-system mounting, although it also needs a suitable mount and corded power. The M1 avoids mounting requirements but needs space for sled movement and is the heaviest option.
Conclusion
For one broadly useful conditioning tool, I recommend the TANK M1 if you have room to use and store a 67-pound sled and value the freedom to train across different surfaces. Choose the Relentless Ripper if you already have a compatible mounting point and want ski-style work with ten resistance levels and a monitor. Pick the Relentless Rope Trainer if rope pulling is your priority and your rack or rig meets its compatibility requirements.
My ranking favors the M1 for placement flexibility, the Ripper for structured and trackable sessions, and the rope trainer for compact, specific rope work. Before settling on either mounted model, verify your installation and available space; before choosing the M1, decide whether its weight and less-detailed resistance adjustment suit the way you plan to train.
